Game awards are now major events in the gaming industry, but opinions on their importance remain divided. On one hand, shows like The Game Awards offer a global spotlight for developers. On the other, critics argue they are more spectacle than substance.

Why they matter: Awards provide recognition for developers, especially indie teams. A win or even a nomination can bring major attention to a game that may have otherwise been overlooked. Titles like Celeste, Hades, and Disco Elysium reached larger audiences after sweeping indie or narrative categories.

They also contribute to the public record of industry excellence. Just like films or music, games deserve cultural acknowledgment and formal celebration of innovation in design, audio, narrative, and more.

However, there are valid criticisms. Award shows often prioritize hype and marketing over substance. World premieres, trailers, and celebrity appearances sometimes overshadow the actual celebration of game craft. Some viewers feel the shows lean more into advertising than honoring developers.

There’s also debate around jury transparency. Questions arise about who selects the winners, how decisions are made, and whether commercial interests play a role.

Still, even with their flaws, game awards help define gaming’s cultural moment. They shape legacy. They spark debate. And for players, they can highlight games worth revisiting—or discovering for the first time.

Whether you care about who wins or not, game awards remind us that games are not just entertainment—they’re an art form worthy of celebration.